THE REGULATION OF ESCHERICHIA-COLI GLUTAMINE-SYNTHETASE REVISITED - ROLE OF 2-KETOGLUTARATE IN THE REGULATION OF GLUTAMINE-SYNTHETASE ADENYLYLATION STATE
P. Jiang et al., THE REGULATION OF ESCHERICHIA-COLI GLUTAMINE-SYNTHETASE REVISITED - ROLE OF 2-KETOGLUTARATE IN THE REGULATION OF GLUTAMINE-SYNTHETASE ADENYLYLATION STATE, Biochemistry (Easton), 37(37), 1998, pp. 12802-12810
The regulation of Escherichia call glutamine synthetase (GS) by revers
ible adenylylation has provided one of the classical paradigms for sig
nal transduction by cyclic cascades. Yet, many mechanistic features of
this regulation remain to be elucidated. We examined the regulation o
f GS adenylylation state in a reconstituted system containing GS, aden
ylyltransferase (ATase), the PII signal transduction protein that cont
rols ATase, and the uridylyltransferase/uridylyl-removing enzyme (UTas
e/UR), which has a role in regulating PII. in this reconstituted bicyc
lic cascade system, the adenylylation state of GS was regulated recipr
ocally by the small molecule effecters 2-ketoglutarate and glutamine a
t physiological effector concentrations. By examination of the individ
ual regulatory monocycles and comparison to the bicyclic system and ex
isting data, we could deduce that the only sensors of 2-ketoglutarate
were PII and PII-UMP. At physiological conditions, we observed that th
e main role of 2-ketoglutarate in bringing about the deadenylylation o
f GS was to inhibit GS adenylylation, and this was due to the alloster
ic regulation of PII activity. Glutamine acted as an allosteric regula
tor of both ATase and UTase/UR. We also compared the regulation of GS
adenylylation stale to the regulation of phosphorylation state of the
transcription factor NRI (NtrC) in a reconstituted bicyclic system con
taining NRI, the bifunctional kinase/phosphatase NRII (NtrB), PII, and
the UTase/UR. This comparison indicated that, at a fixed 2-ketoglutar
ate concentration, the regulation of GS adenylylation state by glutami
ne was sharper and occurred at a higher concentration than did the reg
ulation of NRI phosphorylation. The possible biological implications o
f this regulatory arrangement are discussed.