A COMPARISON OF THE EFFICACY OF ORAL FLUCONAZOLE, 150 MG WEEK VERSUS 50 MG/DAY IN THE TREATMENT OF TINEA-CORPORIS, TINEA-CRURIS, TINEA-PEDIS, AND CUTANEOUS CANDIDOSIS/

Citation
M. Nozickova et al., A COMPARISON OF THE EFFICACY OF ORAL FLUCONAZOLE, 150 MG WEEK VERSUS 50 MG/DAY IN THE TREATMENT OF TINEA-CORPORIS, TINEA-CRURIS, TINEA-PEDIS, AND CUTANEOUS CANDIDOSIS/, International journal of dermatology, 37(9), 1998, pp. 703-705
Citations number
7
Categorie Soggetti
Dermatology & Venereal Diseases
ISSN journal
00119059
Volume
37
Issue
9
Year of publication
1998
Pages
703 - 705
Database
ISI
SICI code
0011-9059(1998)37:9<703:ACOTEO>2.0.ZU;2-4
Abstract
Two hundred and forty five patients with dermatophytoses and cutaneous candidosis were enrolled in the study; 122 were randomized to the onc e-weekly regimen and 123 to the once-daily regimen, Subjects included both men and women; the average age was 42 years. There were no statis tically significant differences between the two groups with regard to age, sex, race, and body weight distributions. In the group receiving once-weekly fluconazole, there were 58 tinea pedis infections and 77 n onpedis infections (tinea corporis, tinea cruris, and cutaneous candid osis). In the group receiving once-daily fluconazole, there were 56 ti nea pedis infections acid 76 nonpedis infections. The duration of infe ction and total score of signs and symptoms did not differ significant ly between the two groups. Patients received treatment until clinicall y cured or up to a maximum of 6 weeks for tinea pedis and 4 weeks for tinea corporis, tinea cruris, or cutaneous candidosis, Medical history , physical and laboratory examinations, and the clinical diagnosis wer e recorded. Clinical and mycologic examinations and laboratory testing were performed at baseline and 2 weeks after treatment initiation, an d then weekly until clinically cured or the maximum duration of treatm ent allowed was reached. Safety analysis was performed for all patient s. Follow-up clinical and mycologic examinations were performed 1 mont h after the therapy ended. The clinical efficacy was based on cure (di sappearance of all baseline signs and symptoms of infection), marked i mprovement, moderate improvement, failure (no change or worsening of t he signs and symptoms), or unevaluable (most commonly due to protocol evaluations or the absence of an identified pathogen), Mycologic effic acy was based on eradication (absence of pathogen on microscopy and/or culture), persistence (presence of pathogen on microscopy and/or cult ure), superinfection (absence of pathogen, but with a different fungal pathogen on microscopy and culture associated with clinical disease), or unevaluable, Long-term follow-up evaluation included the category relapse, defined as the absence of pathogen at the end of treatment, w ith the reappearance of that pathogen on microscopy and/or culture at follow-up visit. The culture result determined the efficacy where disc repancies between microscopy and culture findings occurred.