K. Ruohomaki et al., CHARACTERIZATION AND REMOVAL OF HUMIC SUBSTANCES IN ULTRA-FILTRATION AND NANOFILTRATION, Desalination, 118(1-3), 1998, pp. 273-283
Sixty percent of the Finnish lakes can be described as humic waters. H
umic-free water is required in industry; for instance, in the paper ma
king process the brightness may decrease because of humic water. One a
im of this investigation was to study the removal of humic substances
from different waters with ultrafiltration (UF) and nanofiltration (NF
) using salts and retention aids as pretreatments. The other aim was t
o characterize humic acids with different methods. In both UF and NF o
f moorland water, retention was good without any pretreatment, but a s
mall positive effect was obtained with AlCl3, NaCl, KCl and FeCl3. Ret
ention aids did not improve the retention, but the cationic ones were
affected slightly positively. In NF a higher pressure evidently improv
ed retention. In every case pH had a great influence because at a low
pH the structure of humic acid is more compact and no fouling occurs.
Humic acid was analyzed using GOD, TOC, UV/VIS, SEM-EDAX, FTIR and zet
a potential methods. Adsorption of humic acid was tested with polymer
films using contact angle measurements and also with active carbon and
carrot adsorbents. Adsorption was strongest at pH 3 in every trial an
d active carbon adsorbed humic acid much more than carrot adsorbents.