Operant response rates may decrease within experimental sessions. The
most likely explanation for the decrease is that satiation or habituat
ion reduces the effectiveness of the repeatedly presented reinforcer.
We argue that, contrary to intuition, both empirical and formal argume
nts favor habituation over satiation. Attributing the decreases in ope
rant responding partly to habituation challenges the traditional assum
ption that habituation alters only reflexive behavior and does not occ
ur to biologically significant stimuli. It preserves common terminolog
y during operant and classical conditioning and when appetitive and av
ersive stimuli are used. It may provide a relatively general descripti
on of temporal changes in behavior in a wide variety of situations and
may help to integrate motivational variables into theories of conditi
oning.