REFINED TUBERCULOSIS CONTACT TRACING IN A LOW INCIDENCE AREA

Citation
S. Ansari et al., REFINED TUBERCULOSIS CONTACT TRACING IN A LOW INCIDENCE AREA, Respiratory medicine, 92(9), 1998, pp. 1127-1131
Citations number
13
Categorie Soggetti
Respiratory System","Cardiac & Cardiovascular System
Journal title
ISSN journal
09546111
Volume
92
Issue
9
Year of publication
1998
Pages
1127 - 1131
Database
ISI
SICI code
0954-6111(1998)92:9<1127:RTCTIA>2.0.ZU;2-P
Abstract
Our aim was to evaluate the efficacy of a revised tuberculosis (TB) co ntact tracing procedure in South Glamorgan whereby routine annual radi ological surveillance was abandoned and contacts were either discharge d or referred to chest clinic following their initial screening. We re viewed and evaluated data from the TB contact tracing clinic, the Publ ic Health Service Mycobacterium Reference Unit, Cardiff and the Consul tant in Communicable Diseases Control, South Glamorgan Health Authorit y and compared these results with those of our previous study. One hun dred and three index cases and 732 contacts were identified. Seven hun dred and seven contacts, 526 close and 181 casual, were screened, of w hom 102 casuals should not have been. One hundred and sixty-one contac ts were given BCG vaccination. Fifty-four contacts were referred to th e chest clinic. Seven cases of TB were detected, all in young, unvacci nated, close contacts of pulmonary disease. Twenty-one contacts were g iven chemoprophylaxis, 20 of whom were close contacts of pulmonary TB and one of extrapulmonary disease. Five contacts who were screened and initially discharged developed TB later: in two the protocol had not been followed and three presented with extrapulmonary TB. Compared wit h the results of the previous protocol fewer contacts were unnecessari ly screened and referrals to the chest clinic increased, as did the nu mber given chemoprophylaxis. The case finding rate is similar to that found prior to the revision of the protocol. The yield from tracing ca sual contacts continues to be nil. It is very low in contacts of extra pulmonary disease. When the protocol was followed no case of pulmonary TB was missed. The revised protocol seems to be as effective as the p revious, more complex protocol. In our area, one of low incidence of T B, screening of casual contacts and of contacts of extrapulmonary TB i s not cost-effective. We will concentrate even more on screening close contacts of pulmonary TB.