Between 1971 and 1996 opponents of local funding for public schools su
ccessfully challenged the constitutionality of school-finance systems
in 16 states. Using the variation across states in the timing of these
cases we investigate the impact of reform on the distribution of scho
ol resources. Our results suggest that court-ordered finance reform re
duced within-state inequality in spending by 19 to 34 percent. Success
ful litigation reduced inequality by raising spending in the poorest d
istricts while leaving spending in the richest districts unchanged the
reby increasing aggregate spending on education. Reform led states to
fund additional spending through higher state taxes.