The evolution of leks (aggregations of males displaying to females) ca
nnot be explained solely by an increasing average gain in matings for
each male as group size increases. This is because the mating skew, th
at is, the inequality among males in mating success, is often high and
may vary with lek size. Here, we show that the common observation tha
t matings become more evenly divided as lek size increases is also ins
ufficient to explain by itself the benefits of aggregating. The benefi
ts to individual males are highly sensitive to the exact relationship
between mating skew and lek size, and very similar relationships can l
ead to opposite predictions concerning individual benefits. With data
on published mating success for 18 species (71 leks), we show that dif
ferent species have very similar skew versus lek size relationships. W
ith current sample sizes, however,there is insufficient statistical po
wer to distinguish between completely different alternatives concernin
g individual optima of males. (C) 1998 The Association for the Study o
f Animal Behaviour.