The quality of medical education is lamentable. The quality-management
approach (QM) is prescribed as a remedy. However, the different nomen
clatures used in QM or education may give rise to misunderstanding. Re
sistance to quality management strategies can be observed in medical e
ducation in spite of the merits of QM in the industrial field. A liter
ature review was carried out, demonstrating the isomorphism among mana
gement features of the different fields by concept mapping, and a case
study of the implementation of QM in medical education. MedLine does
not focus on quality management in medical education. The nomenclature
of QM and education is different; however, it was translated and used
for instructional design purposes in the Munich Curricular Innovation
Project (M-CIP). Quality management's key concept of evaluation can e
vidently be applied for educational purposes. Evaluation is the centra
l underlying structure in both approaches. QM and education represent
different contexts but their underlying concepts (e.g. statistical pro
cess control) are isomorphic. Quantification of quality by evaluation
using operationalized, structured terms is a universal methodological
approach which allows the determination of quality from different cont
exts. QM models, such as the PDCA cycle, can be used for instructional
design purposes as experienced in the Munich Curricular Innovation Pr
oject as well as in several existing quality improvement projects. The
evaluation results of the QM-driven educational projects demonstrate
improved teaching/learning quality, cost containment and are accepted
by students and teachers as well. It is concluded that methods of qual
ity management can evidently be transferred to the educational field.
The evaluational feedback loops fundamentally applied in QM also work
in education. This is relevant for improving the quality of medical ed
ucation.