Background and Purpose: Family history is perceived to be an important
risk factor for stroke despite conflicting published data. We examine
d patterns of familial aggregation of stroke among three generations u
sing data from the Framingham Study. Methods: Cox proportional hazards
analyses, adjusting for known stroke risk factors, were used to exami
ne familial concordance in three groups: (1) members of the original F
ramingham cohort using reported parental stroke death; (2) members of
the Framingham Offspring Study and their parents (members of the origi
nal Framingham Study); and (3) sibships within the original Framingham
cohort. Results: We found no association between stroke or transient
ischemic attack among original cohort members and their reported paren
tal stroke death (n=4933; relative risk [RR]=1.07). Using verified cas
es of parental stroke or transient ischemic attack, the Offspring anal
yses revealed that both paternal (n=1762; RR=2.4; 95% confidence inter
val [CI], 0.96 to 6.03) and maternal (n=2074; RR=1.4; 95% CI, 0.60 to
3.25) histories were associated with an increased risk. Parental histo
ry of coronary heart disease was strongly associated with stroke or tr
ansient ischemic attack among Offspring Study members (RR=3.33; 95% CI
, 1.27 to 8.72). Sibling history of stroke or transient ischemic attac
k was not associated with stroke or transient ischemic attack among or
iginal cohort members, although a non-statistically significant increa
sed risk associated with sibling history of atherothrombotic brain inf
arction was observed (RR=1.8; 95% CI, 0.68 to 4.94). Conclusions: Thes
e analyses suggest that parental history of stroke may be a risk facto
r for stroke. As more stroke or transient ischemic attack events devel
op among the Offspring Study members, it will be valuable to reexamine
these associations.