Background Diagnostic comorbidity is prevalent in psychiatry and may b
e inadequately captured by the DSM -III/ III-R nosology. Methods The l
ifetime presence of I I psychiatric diagnoses was determined by struct
ured personal interviews of a population-based sample of 1898 female t
wins. We used latent class analysis to derive an empirical typology. R
esults Six classes provided the best fit to the data. Their mnemonics
were: minimal disorder (60% of the sample), major depression - general
ised anxiety disorder (19%), alcohol - nicotine (7%), highly comorbid
major depression (5%) and eating disorders (3%).The validity of this t
ypology was strongly supported by demographic, health, personality and
attitudinal validators along with the significant monozygotic twin co
ncordance for class membership. The typology superficially resembled D
SM - III - R, but contained many differences. Major depression appeare
d in three forms (alone, with generalised anxiety disorder and with co
nsiderable comorbidity). Alcoholism-nicotine dependence and the variou
s anxiety disorders formed discrete classes, but were also prominent i
n other classes. Bulimia and anorexia were exceptional in their appear
ance in a single class. Conclusions The DSM-III-Rand closely related D
SM - IV nosology did not capture the natural tendency of these disorde
rs to co-occur. Fundamental assumptions of the dominant diagnostic sch
emata may be incorrect.