Probabilistic Seismic Hazard,Analysis (PSHA) is a methodology that est
imates the likelihood that various levels of earthquake-caused ground
motions will be exceeded at a given location in a given future time pe
riod. Due to large uncertainties in all of the geosciences data and in
their modeling, multiple model interpretations are often possible. Th
is leads to disagreements among the experts, which in the past has led
to disagreement on the selection of a ground motion for design at a g
iven site. This paper reports on a project, co-sponsored by the U.S. N
uclear Regulatory Commission, the U.S. Department of Energy, and the E
lectric Power Research Institute, that was undertaken to review the st
ate-of-the-art and improve on the overall stability of the PSHA proces
s, by providing methodological guidance or! how to perform a PSHA. The
project reviewed past studies and examined ways to improve on the pre
sent state-of-the-art. In analyzing past PSHA studies, the most import
ant conclusion is that differences in PSHA results are commonly due to
process rather than technical differences. Thus, the project concentr
ated heavily on developing process recommendations, especially on the
use of multiple experts, and this paper reports on those process recom
mendations. The problem of facilitating and integrating the judgments
of a diverse group of experts is analyzed in detail. The authors belie
ve that the concepts and process principles apply just as well to non-
earthquake fields such as volcanic hazard, flood risk, nuclear-plant s
afety, and climate change.