It is often assumed that assessments based on commercial catch and eff
ort data, such as a virtual population analysis, will track trends in
abundance more accurately than assessments produced by research survey
s. Catch and effort data from a fishery provide information on the fis
h that were caught. For many fisheries, assessments based on catch dat
a, even those incorporating survey data, are quite variable and may gi
ve a misleading picture of the health of the entire stock. Though abun
dance estimates generated by marine surveys are also variable, they of
ten appear to track abundance trends more accurately than techniques t
hat use catch data. Some statistical methods for analyzing survey data
are briefly reviewed and comparative case studies of the assessments
of the Newfoundland northern cod stock, the Namibian hake stocks, and
Barents Sea cod and haddock are presented. Given the uncertainties inh
erent in a catch based assessment, it is concluded that surveys should
be used to generate an assessment independent of catch statistics as
a check of the catch based estimates. (C) 1998 Elsevier Science B.V. A
ll rights reserved.