Re. Kelly et al., INHALED INDUCTION AND EMERGENCE FROM DESFLURANE ANESTHESIA IN THE AMBULATORY SURGICAL PATIENT - THE EFFECT OF PREMEDICATION, Anesthesia and analgesia, 77(3), 1993, pp. 540-543
We studied the effect of premedication (1 mug/kg fentanyl and 0.04 mg/
kg midazolam 5 min before induction of anesthesia) on airway reactivit
y and hemodynamic stability during inhaled induction using desflurane
in 10 ambulatory surgical patients. Eight patients who were anesthetiz
ed without premedication served as the controls. Induction and emergen
ce were rapid and unaffected by premedication. End-tidal and inspired
concentrations of desflurane at loss of consciousness were significant
ly reduced by premedication (10.1% end-tidal/14.1% inspired, no premed
ication, vs. 5.3% end-tidal/8.9% inspired, premedication). Airway irri
tability was markedly attenuated by premedication (100% no premedicati
on versus 30% premedicated), as was apnea (37.5% no premedication vers
us 0% premedicated). We observed an increase in mean arterial blood pr
essure and heart rate after loss of consciousness (mean arterial press
ure 103 vs 121 mm Hg, heart rate 73 vs 100 bpm) in the unpremedicated
patients, whereas both groups demonstrated a decrease in mean arterial
blood pressure with no change in heart rate when baseline values were
compared to those at incision (103 vs 74 mm Hg, no premedication, 99
vs 81 mm Hg premedicated). Patient acceptability was satisfactory and
unchanged by premedication. We recommend the use of such premedication
when desflurane is used during the induction of anesthesia.