PREDICTING PRESSURE ULCER RISK - A MULTISITE STUDY OF THE PREDICTIVE-VALIDITY OF THE BRADEN SCALE

Citation
N. Bergstrom et al., PREDICTING PRESSURE ULCER RISK - A MULTISITE STUDY OF THE PREDICTIVE-VALIDITY OF THE BRADEN SCALE, Nursing research, 47(5), 1998, pp. 261-269
Citations number
12
Categorie Soggetti
Nursing,"Health Care Sciences & Services
Journal title
ISSN journal
00296562
Volume
47
Issue
5
Year of publication
1998
Pages
261 - 269
Database
ISI
SICI code
0029-6562(1998)47:5<261:PPUR-A>2.0.ZU;2-H
Abstract
Background:There have been no studies that have tested the Braden Scal e for predictive validity and established cutoff points for assessing risk specific to different settings. Objectives: To evaluate the predi ctive validity of the Braden Scale in a variety of settings (tertiary care hospitals, Veterans Administration Medical Centers [VAMCs], and s killed nursing facilities [SNFs]). To determine the critical cutoff po int for classifying risk in these settings and whether this cutoff poi nt differs between settings. To determine the optimal timing for asses sing risk across settings. Method Randomly selected subjects (N= 843) older than 19 years of age from a variety of care settings who did not have pressure ulcers on admission were included. Subjects were 63% me n, 79% Caucasian, and had a mean age of 63 (+/-16) years. Subjects wer e assessed for pressure ulcers using the Braden Scale every 48 to 72 h ours for 1 to 4 weeks. The Braden Scale score and skin assessment were independently rated, and the data collectors were blind to the findin gs of the other measures. Results: One hundred eight of 843 (12.8%) su bjects developed pressure ulcers. The incidence was 8.5%, 7.4%, and 23 .9% in tertiary care hospitals, VAMCs, and SNFs, respectively Subjects who developed pressure ulcers were older and more likely to be female than those who did not develop ulcers. Braden Scale scores were signi ficantly (p =.0001) tower in those who developed ulcers than in those who did not develop ulcers. Overall, the critical cutoff score for pre dicting risk was 18. Risk assessment on admission is highly predictive of pressure ulcer development in all settings but not as predictive a s the assessment completed 48 to 72 hours after admission. Conclusions : Risk assessment on admission is important for timely planning of pre ventive strategies. Ongoing assessment in SNFs and VAMCs improves pred iction and permits fine-tuning of the risk-based prevention protocols. in tertiary care the most accurate prediction occurs at 48 to 72 hour s after admission and at this time the care plan can be refined.