Ea. Ghoname et al., The effect of stimulus frequency on the analgesic response to percutaneouselectrical nerve stimulation in patients with chronic low back pain, ANESTH ANAL, 88(4), 1999, pp. 841-846
Citations number
26
Categorie Soggetti
Aneshtesia & Intensive Care","Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
Low back pain (LBP) is one of the most common medical problems in our socie
ty. Increasingly, patients are turning to nonpharmacologic analgesic therap
ies such as percutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (PENS). We designed t
his sham-controlled study to compare the effect of three different frequenc
ies of electrical stimulation on the analgesic response to PENS therapy. Si
xty-eight consenting patients with LBP secondary to degenerative lumbar dis
c disease were treated with PENS therapy at 4 Hz, alternating 15 Hz and 30
Hz (15/30 Hz), and 100 Hz, as well as sham-PENS (0 Hz), according to a rand
omized, cross-over study design. Each treatment was administered for a peri
od of 30 min three times per week for 2 wk. The pre- and posttreatment asse
ssments included the health status survey short form and visual analog scal
es for pain, physical activity, and quality of sleep. After receiving all f
our treatments, patients completed a global assessment questionnaire. The s
ham-PENS treatments failed to produce changes in the degree of pain, physic
al activity, sleep quality, or daily intake of oral analgesic medications.
In contrast, 4-Hz, 15/30-Hz, and 100-Hz stimulation all produced significan
t decreases in the severity of pain, increases in physical activity, improv
ements in the quality of sleep, and decreases in oral analgesic requirement
s (P < 0.01). Of the three frequencies, 15/30 Hz was the most effective in
decreasing pain, increasing physical activity, and improving the quality of
sleep (P < 0.05). In the global assessment, 40% of the patients reported t
hat 15/30 Hz was the most desirable therapy, and it was also more effective
in improving the patient's sense of wellbeing. We conclude that the freque
ncy of electrical stimulation is an important determinant of the analgesic
response to PENS therapy. Alternating stimulation at 15-Hz and 30-Hz freque
ncies was more effective than either 4 Hz or 100 Hz in improving outcome me
asures in patients with LBP. Implications: The frequency of electrical stim
ulation seems to be an important determinant of the analgesic efficacy of p
ercutaneous electrical nerve stimulation. Mixed low- and high-frequency sti
mulation was more effective than either low or high frequencies alone in th
e treatment of patients with low back pain.