Be. Udermann et al., Pelvic restraint effect on lumbar gluteal and hamstring muscle electromyographic activation, ARCH PHYS M, 80(4), 1999, pp. 428-431
Objective: To evaluate the influence of pelvic restraint on electromyograph
ic activation (neural drive) of the lumbar extensor, gluteal, and hamstring
muscles during submaximal dynamic lumbar extension in an upright seated po
sition.
Design: Randomized, balanced, crossover trial comparing the electromyograph
ic activation of the lumbar, gluteal, and hamstring muscles during dynamic
lumbar extension exercise with and without pelvic restraint.
Setting: Research laboratory at a private research university.
Subjects: Twelve apparently healthy men (ages 18 to 50yrs).
Intervention: Dynamic lumbar extension exercises.
Main Outcome Measure: Electromyographic recordings.
Results: Pelvic restraint did not influence the relative activation of the
lumbar, gluteal, or hamstring muscle groups (p less than or equal to.05) du
ring submaximal dynamic lumbar extension exercise. The relative activation
of the gluteal muscles was significantly lower than that of the lumbar exte
nsor and hamstring muscle groups.
Conclusions: Pelvic restraint is not a requirement to promote neural drive
to the lumbar musculature during submaximal dynamic lumbar extension exerci
se performed in an upright seated position. Submaximal lumbar extension exe
rcise reduces the relative contribution of the gluteal muscles compared wit
h a maximal voluntary isometric contraction.
(C) 1999 by the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the Americ
an Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation.