The morphology of incisor and molar teeth of tammar wallabies (Macropus eug
enii Desmarest) is similar to that of the archetypal grazing macropod (M. g
iganteus) but there are some resemblances in the wear pattern of molars to
that of grazer/browsers. Incisor wear patterns show that cutting during bit
ing is by scissor-like action of the elevated labial enamel edge of an attr
ition facet on each lower incisor being occluded with, and rotated supero-m
edially across, the buccal surface of the upper incisor arcade. With increa
se in age and body size, the cutting surface moves from anterior to lateral
upper incisors, progressive wear on the inner surface of the lateral upper
incisors permitting an increasing degree of incisor action coincident with
medial molar movement in Phase 2 occlusion, which is similarly achieved by
medial rotation of the jaw.
Significant distal movement of the reference point for molar index, along t
he line of the upper jaw, with increase in body size, indicates that this i
ndex does not measure the absolute mesial movement of molars in the plane o
f occlusion. The estimated value of absolute mesial movement of the first u
pper premolar along the line of the jaw (2.45 mm year(-1)) is at the known
limits of mesial drift. Studies of size-related changes in the linear dimen
sions of various bony landmarks on jawbone and skull indicate that the high
rate of movement may result from deposition of bone in the rear of the too
th row, i.e. 'mesial shift', as well as mesial drift. However, mesial shift
may not account for significant differences in rates of absolute mesial mo
vement of upper molars with gender.
With increase in body size, the caudal insertions of the masseter and tempo
ralis and the cranial origin of the line of action of masseter all move dis
tally along the plane of occlusion. However, a concurrent mesial movement i
n the cranial origin of the line of action of the temporalis may act to cou
nter any distal movement of occlusive force along the jaw-line and to decre
ase the relative force of the retraction component that opposes Phase 1 occ
lusion.