In experiment 1, five goldfish (Carassius auratus) paddle-pressed on fixed-
interval (FI) and variable-interval (VI) schedules for food pellet reinforc
ement. The order of conditions was FI 60 s, FI 240 s, Fl 30 s, FI 60 s, and
VI 60 s. Fl responding showed a scalloped pattern and response-rate break
points were proportional to interval duration. Post-food wait times varied
with interval duration, but were not proportional. Response rate on VI was
constant. Experiment 2 studied the properties of food reinforcement as a ti
me marker. The same five fish were presented an FI 60 s schedule of reinfor
cement with 25% of intervals ending in non-reinforcement (N). The fish resp
onded faster and paused less following the omission stimulus (omission effe
ct) and response rate was hat or declined through post-N intervals. (C) 199
9 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.