BACKGROUND, The question of curability of breast carcinoma remains controve
rsial. Because the probability of cure essentially is an asymptotic notion,
the corresponding estimation problems call for special statistical methods
. Such methods should account for an intimate connection between the probab
ility of cure and the shape of the hazard function.
METHODS, The study was performed on survival data for 13,166 women with bre
ast carcinoma identified through the Utah Cancer Registry and stratified by
clinical stage and age at diagnosis. For these patients, the follow-up per
iod was 30 years. Three estimation procedures were used for estimating the
hazard function from the data: the life table estimator, a kernel counterpa
rt of the Nelson-Aalen estimator, and a parametric estimator specifically d
esigned for two-component hazards. The parametric estimate of the hazard fu
nction was used to provide estimates of cure rates for each category of pat
ients.
RESULTS. For all categories of patients under study, the estimated hazard f
unctions passed through a clear-cut maximum, showing a tendency to decrease
as time approached the end of a follow-up period. The hazards appeared to
be nonproportional across the strata. The estimated values of the cure rate
and the corresponding confidence intervals were determined for each stratu
m of patients with breast carcinoma.
CONCLUSIONS. The results of the current study strongly suggest that cure is
a possible outcome of breast carcinoma treatment. The condition of proport
ionality of risks is not met in breast carcinoma survival data. (C) 1999 Am
erican Cancer Society.