Effects of screw types in cementless fixation of tibial tray implants: stability and strength assessment

Citation
Tq. Lee et al., Effects of screw types in cementless fixation of tibial tray implants: stability and strength assessment, CLIN BIOMEC, 14(4), 1999, pp. 258-264
Citations number
24
Categorie Soggetti
Ortopedics, Rehabilitation & Sport Medicine
Journal title
CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS
ISSN journal
02680033 → ACNP
Volume
14
Issue
4
Year of publication
1999
Pages
258 - 264
Database
ISI
SICI code
0268-0033(199905)14:4<258:EOSTIC>2.0.ZU;2-H
Abstract
Objective. To test the stability and strength of tibial trays fixed with co rtical screws and tibial trays fixed with cancellous screws under axial and anterior-posterior shear loading conditions. Design. Five matched human fresh frozen cadaver knees without prior patholo gy were used as paired specimens for comparison of cortical to cancellous s crew fixation of tibial trays. Background. Current cementless fixation of tibial trays in total knee arthr oplasty is obtained by using a combination of stems, keels, posts, pegs, an d screws, To date there has been no study comparing isolated cortical and c ancellous screw fixation in cementless arthroplasty. Methods. An Instron machine and a video digitizing system were used to exam ine tibial tray lift-off, subsidence, and anterior-posterior load to failur e at the bone-implant interface in five matched pairs of knees and compare the difference between cancellous and cortical screw fixation. Results. Non-destructive cyclic testing showed a significant difference bet ween the two types of screws for tibial tray subsidence with cancellous fix ation greater than cortical (P< 0.05), but not for lift-off (P> 0.05). Load to failure testing in anterior-posterior direction did not result in a sig nificant difference between the two types of screws for initial stiffness a nd ultimate load (P>0.05), but did result in a significant difference of en ergy absorbed to failure (P < 0.01), Conclusions. The difference in amount of subsidence between cortical and ca ncellous fixation could possibly be due to microfractures of the underlying trabecular bone with cancellous fixation. Neither screw type was able to c ompletely fix the tibial tray to bone and prevent micromotion. Although the load at failure for anterior-posterior shear was similar for the two screw types, the energy absorbed was greater for the cortical screws which may b e a result of additional strength provided by the cortical bone surrounding the screw.