Kinematic characterization of standing reach: comparison of younger vs older subjects

Citation
Jt. Cavanaugh et al., Kinematic characterization of standing reach: comparison of younger vs older subjects, CLIN BIOMEC, 14(4), 1999, pp. 271-279
Citations number
30
Categorie Soggetti
Ortopedics, Rehabilitation & Sport Medicine
Journal title
CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS
ISSN journal
02680033 → ACNP
Volume
14
Issue
4
Year of publication
1999
Pages
271 - 279
Database
ISI
SICI code
0268-0033(199905)14:4<271:KCOSRC>2.0.ZU;2-9
Abstract
Objective. To characterize typical spinal motions that occur during standin g reach and to describe differences in spinal motions and center of pressur e displacements during reach between younger and older healthy adults. Design. Exploratory, cross sectional investigation utilizing video motion a nd biomechanics force platform analysis, Background. Standing reach provides a means for assessing both arm function and balance control in the context of a common functional activity, The in teraction between age-related declines in spinal mobility and the spinal mo tion occurring during reach is poorly understood. The characterization of s pinal motions during task performance for healthy subjects of different age groups is an important first step for understanding the relationship betwe en impairments and physical performance in disabled populations. Methods, Thirty-four subjects ages 20-36 and 33 subjects ages 60-76 partici pated. Video motion and force plate analysis were used to characterize spin al motion and center of pressure displacements during the functional reach test for younger and older subjects. Results. Spinal motion during standing reach was characterized by forward t runk flexion, lateral trunk flexion, thoracolumbar rotation, and lower body rotation. Younger and older subjects differed (P= 0.05) in the amount of f orward trunk flexion and thoracolumbar rotation which occurred but not lowe r body rotation. Younger subjects displaced their center of pressure furthe r forward (P = 0.0001) and through a greater percentage of their initial ba se of support (P = 0.0001) than older subjects. Conclusion. This study provides the first multiplanar characterization of s pinal motion used during standing reach. Significant differences for a numb er of variables existed between younger and older subjects.