Comparison of sparfloxacin and clarithromycin in the treatment of acute bacterial maxillary sinusitis

Citation
Dc. Henry et al., Comparison of sparfloxacin and clarithromycin in the treatment of acute bacterial maxillary sinusitis, CLIN THER, 21(2), 1999, pp. 340-352
Citations number
32
Categorie Soggetti
Pharmacology
Journal title
CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS
ISSN journal
01492918 → ACNP
Volume
21
Issue
2
Year of publication
1999
Pages
340 - 352
Database
ISI
SICI code
0149-2918(199902)21:2<340:COSACI>2.0.ZU;2-#
Abstract
Five hundred four patients were enrolled in a randomized, double-masked, mu lticenter study comparing the efficacy and tolerability of a 10-day regimen of sparfloxacin with a 14-day regimen of clarithromycin in the treatment o f acute maxillary sinusitis. Two hundred fifty-two patients received sparfl oxacin as a single 400-mg dose on day 1 and 200 mg once daily for 9 additio nal days, and 252 patients received clarithromycin 500 mg twice daily for 1 4 days. in the all-treated population, clinical success was observed at 6 t o 10 days after therapy in approximately 82% of the patients in each treatm ent group. A total of 430 patients met the inclusion criteria for clinical assessment. The success rates in these patients were also comparable, at 83 .1% and 83.4% for the sparfloxacin and clarithromycin groups, respectively. Sustained clinical success rates in the all-treated population 3 to 4 week s after therapy were 71.6% for the sparfloxacin group and 68.6% for the cla rithromycin group. All treated patients were included in the tolerability a nalysis. The frequency of adverse events in the clarithromycin and sparflox acin groups was 57.9% and 48.4%, respectively. The most frequently noted ad verse events were diarrhea, photosensitivity reaction, taste perversion, na usea, and abdominal pain; >96% of adverse events in the sparfloxacin group and 94% of adverse events in the clarithromycin group were of mild or moder ate severity. Among adverse events at least possibly related to study drug, photosensitivity reaction was more common in the sparfloxacin group (9.5% vs 0.4%), whereas taste perversion (8.7% vs 0.8%) and abdominal pain (3.6% vs 1.6%) were more common in the clarithromycin group. Thus the sparfloxaci n's more convenient regimen was as effective as clarithromycin in the treat ment of acute bacterial maxillary sinusitis, and the overall frequency of a dverse events with sparfloxacin was comparable to that with clarithromycin.