The paper analyses the social optimal management of terrestrial animal spec
ies where landuse costs, non-consumptive benefits of the wild species and n
uisance costs, in addition to harvesting profit, are taken into account. Wh
en there is harvesting, it is demonstrated that increased profitability of
the alternative land-use activities will result in less animals and habitat
land in the long-term. It is also shown that the price effect of the harve
sting works different compared to the traditional Clark-model of marine res
ources. Because most terrestrial species represent no harvesting profit and
are not harvested, the non-harvesting case is also analysed. Also now will
improved profitability in the competing activities of keeping animals be a
threat to the wild species as it triggers land-use conversion. Moreover, i
n absence of harvesting profit, there are no potential counteracting forces
due to the existence of harvesting profit.