A. Beirith et al., Antinociceptive properties and nitric oxide synthase inhibitory action of new ruthenium complexes, EUR J PHARM, 369(3), 1999, pp. 289-297
This study evaluates the actions of the new ruthenium complexes trans-[RuCl
2(nic)(4)] (Complex I) and trans-[RuCl2(i-nic)(4)] (Complex LT) as antinoci
ceptives, and their interaction with nitric oxide isoenzymes and with acety
lcholine-induced relaxation of rat and rabbit aorta. Complex II inhibited,
in a graded manner, neuronal and inducible nitric oxide (NO) synthase, and
was about two fold more effective in inhibiting the neuronal NO synthase th
an the inducible form of the enzyme. Complex I was inactive. Both complexes
failed to interfere with constitutive endothelial nitric oxide synthase be
cause they did not change the mean arterial blood pressure of rats. The vas
orelaxant effect of acetylcholine was markedly antagonised by the Complexes
I and II in rings of both rat and rabbit aorta. Complexes I and II, given
intraperitoneally, like N-omega-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME) and
N-G-nitro-L-arginine (L-NOARG), inhibited, in a graded manner, both phases
of the pain response induced by formalin. The actions of L-NAME, L-NOARG an
d Complex II, but not that of Complex I, were largely reversed by L-arginin
e. Both complexes failed to affect the motor response of animals in the rot
a-rod test and had no effect in the hot-plate assay. Together, these findin
gs provide indications that the new ruthenium complexes, especially Complex
LI and its derivatives, might be of potential therapeutic benefit in the m
anagement of pain disorders. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights rese
rved.