D. Sechter et al., A double-blind comparison of sertraline and fluoxetine in the treatment ofmajor depressive episode in outpatients, EUR PSYCHIA, 14(1), 1999, pp. 41-48
Depression is associated with considerable morbidity and mortality. As depr
essive disorders carry a high risk of relapse, treatment strategies include
the use of a 6-month continuation period after resolution of the acute epi
sode. Tolerability is of major importance when determining compliance and o
utcome during long-term therapy. Due to the superior tolerability profile o
f the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) over the older tricyc
lic antidepressants (TCAs), the former may be more suitable for extended th
erapy. Comparative studies have not shown differences between the SSRIs in
terms of efficacy, but side-effect profiles may vary. A multicenter, double
-blind, comparative study of sertraline and fluoxetine was carried out in o
utpatients fulfilling DSM-III-R criteria for major depressive disorder. Pat
ients were randomised to receive sertraline (50-150 mg, n = 118) or fluoxet
ine (20-60 mg, n = 120) for 24 weeks. Assessments for depression (HAM-D, HA
D, CGI-I, CGI-S), anxiety (Covi), sleep (Leeds Sleep Evaluation scale) and
quality of life (SIP) were made at study entry and at weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 18
and 24. All adverse events were recorded to allow evaluation of tolerabili
ty. In total, 88 patients in the sertraline group completed the study compa
red with 79 in the fluoxetine group. Side effects were responsible for the
premature treatment withdrawal of seven (6%) sertraline patients and 12 (10
%) fluoxetine patients. Two-hundred and thirty-four patients were included
in an ITT analysis up to last visit (116 sertraline, 118 fluoxetine). At st
udy endpoint, both treatments produced a significant improvement over basel
ine on all efficacy variables (P < 0.001). Although the magnitude of global
changes in depression, anxiety, and quality of life was larger with sertra
line than fluoxetine, none of the between-group differences reached statist
ical significance. However, significant differences in favour of sertraline
were observed for individual HAM-D items including item 4 (insomnia onset)
(P = 0.04), item 9 (agitation) (P = 0.02), and item 13 (general somatic sy
mptoms) (P = 0.008). In addition, sertraline was associated with significan
tly superior performance on the Leeds Sleep Evaluation scale and on SIP ite
ms relating to sleep and rest, emotional behaviour and ambulation. Both ser
traline and fluoxetine were well tolerated with no significant differences
between treatments. (C) 1999 Elsevier, Paris.