Differences between the trypanosomal and human GlcNAc-PI de-N-acetylases of glycosylphosphatidylinositol membrane anchor biosynthesis

Citation
Dk. Sharma et al., Differences between the trypanosomal and human GlcNAc-PI de-N-acetylases of glycosylphosphatidylinositol membrane anchor biosynthesis, GLYCOBIOLOG, 9(4), 1999, pp. 415-422
Citations number
26
Categorie Soggetti
Biochemistry & Biophysics
Journal title
GLYCOBIOLOGY
ISSN journal
09596658 → ACNP
Volume
9
Issue
4
Year of publication
1999
Pages
415 - 422
Database
ISI
SICI code
0959-6658(199904)9:4<415:DBTTAH>2.0.ZU;2-E
Abstract
De-N-acetylation of N-acetylglucosaminyl-phosphatidylinositol (GlcNAc-PI) i s the second step of glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) membrane anchor bio synthesis in eukaryotes. This step is a prerequisite for the subsequent pro cessing of glucosaminyl-phosphatidylinositol (GlcN-PI) that leads to mature GPI membrane anchor precursors, which are transferred to certain proteins in the endoplasmic reticulum, In this article, we used a direct de-N-acetyl ase assay, based on the release of [C-14]acetate from synthetic GlcN[C-14]A c-PI and analogues thereof, and an indirect assay, based on the mannosylati on of GlcNAc-PI analogues, to study the substrate specificities of the GlcN Ac-PI de-N-acetylase activities of African trypanosomes and human (HeLa) ce lls. The HeLa enzyme was found to be more fastidious than the trypanosomal enzyme such that, unlike the trypanosomal enzyme, it was unable to act on a GlcNAc-PI analogue containing 2-O-octyl-D-myo-inositol or on the GlcNAc-PI diastereoisomer containing L-myo-inositol (GlcNAc-P(L)I). These results su ggest that selective inhibition of the trypanosomal de-N-acetylase may be p ossible and that this enzyme should be considered as a possible therapeutic target. The lack of strict stereospecificity of the trypanosomal de-N-acet ylase for the D-myo-inositol component was also seen for the trypanosomal G PI alpha-mannosyltransferases when GlcNAc-P(L)I was added to the trypanosom e cell-free system, but not when GlcN-P(L)I was used. In an attempt to rati onalize these data, we modeled the structure and dynamics of D-GlcNAc alpha 1-6D-myo-inositol-1-HPO4-(sn)-3-glycerol and its diastereoisomer D-GlcNAc alpha 1-6L-myo-inositol-1-HPO4-(sn)-3-glycerol. These studies indicate that the latter compound visits two energy minima, one of which resembles the l ow-energy conformer of former compound. Thus, it is conceivable that the tr ypanosomal de-N-acetylase acts on GlcNAc-P(L)I when it occupies a GlcNAc-PI -like conformation and that GlcN-P(L)I emerging from the de-N-acetylase may be channeled to the alpha-mannosyltransferases in this conformation.