N. Brown et al., Quality of life four years after acute myocardial infarction: short form 36 scores compared with a normal population, HEART, 81(4), 1999, pp. 352-358
Citations number
28
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Respiratory Systems","Cardiovascular & Hematology Research
Objectives-To assess the impact of myocardial infarction on quality of life
in four year survivors compared to data from "community norms", and to det
ermine factors associated with a poor qualify of life.
Design-Cohort study based on the Nottingham heart attack register.
Setting-Two district general hospitals serving a defined urban/rural popula
tion.
Subjects-All patients admitted with acute myocardial infarction during 1992
and alive at a median of four years.
Main outcome measures-Short form 36 (SF 36) domain and overall scores.
Results-Of 900 patients with an acute myocardial infarction in 1992, there
were 476 patients alive and capable of responding to a questionnaire in 199
7. The response rate was 424 (89.1%). Compared to age and sex adjusted norm
ative data, patients aged under 65 years exhibited impairment in all eight
domains, the largest differences being in physical functioning (mean differ
ence 20 points), role physical (mean difference 23 points), and general hea
lth (mean difference 19 points). In patients over 65 years mean domain scor
es were similar to community norms. Multiple regression analysis revealed t
hat impaired quality of life was closely associated with inability to retur
n to work through ill health, a need for coronary revascularisation, the us
e of anxiolytics, hypnotics or inhalers, the need for two or more angina dr
ugs, a frequency of chest pain one or more times per week, and a Rose dyspn
oea score of greater than or equal to 2.
Conclusions-The SF 36 provides valuable additional information for the prac
tising clinician. Compared to community norms the greatest impact on qualit
y of life is seen in patients of working age. Impaired quality of Life was
reported by patients unfit for work, those with angina and dyspnoea, patien
ts with coexistent lung disease, and those with anxiety and sleep disturban
ces. Improving quality of life after myocardial infarction remains a challe
nge for physicians.