This paper compares the performance of two operations scheduling methods in
a job shop environment. The first method, termed the truncated job shop sc
heduling problem, represents a 'classical' approach to machine scheduling i
n a job shop environment. The second method, termed the complete job shop s
cheduling problem, explicitly considers material handling operations betwee
n processing steps. Evidence that the complete job shop solution performs b
etter under certain circumstances is presented.