Y. Nishikawa et al., Evaluation of endoscopic injection sclerotherapy with and without simultaneous ligation for the treatment of esophageal varices, J GASTRO, 34(2), 1999, pp. 159-162
For more effective and simple endoscopic injection sclerotherapy (EIS) for
esophageal varices, we developed an EIS procedure with ligation (EISL) that
is non-invasive, in which EIS and endoscopic variceal ligation (EVL) are p
erformed simultaneously. In this study, we compared EISL and EIS in a rando
mlized sample of patients (n = 14 for each procedure). For EISL, EVL was pe
rformed, including the injection site, after the injection of 5% ethanolami
ne oleate with iopamidol (EOI) into a varix. The mean number of treatment s
essions required for eradication of esophageal varices was 2.3 +/- 0.5 for
EISL and 3.9 +/- 0.8 for EIS (P < 0.001); the mean number of treatment site
s was 6.2 +/- 2.2 for EISL and 14.0 +/- 5.0 for EIS (P < 0.001); the mean t
otal amount of EOI used was 13.8 +/- 5.2 ml for EISL and 26.3 +/- 9.8 mi fo
r EIS (P < 0.001). There were no significant differences in rates of recurr
ence of varices or in bleeding between the two groups. For EISL, fewer trea
tment sessions and less sclerosant were sufficient, probably because the sc
lerosants were more effective due to the blockage of variceal blood flow by
the ligation. This method should provide a novel modification of EIS.