Evidence for a functional repeat polymorphism in the promoter of the humanNRAMP1 gene that correlates with autoimmune versus infectious disease susceptibility
S. Searle et Jm. Blackwell, Evidence for a functional repeat polymorphism in the promoter of the humanNRAMP1 gene that correlates with autoimmune versus infectious disease susceptibility, J MED GENET, 36(4), 1999, pp. 295-299
Citations number
21
Categorie Soggetti
Research/Laboratory Medicine & Medical Tecnology","Molecular Biology & Genetics
A polymorphism in the promoter of human NRAMP1 encodes a Z-DNA forming dinu
cleotide repeat with four alleles: (1) t(gt)(5)ac(gt)(5)ac(gt)(11)g; (2) t(
gt)(5)ac(gt)(5) ac(gt)(10)g; (3) t(gt)(5)ac(gt)(5)ac(gt)(9)g; and (4) t(gt)
(5)ac(gt)(9)g. Alleles 1 and 4 are rare (gene frequencies similar to 0.001)
; alleles 2 and 3 occur at gene frequencies similar to 0.20-0.25 and simila
r to 0.75-0.80, respectively. Here, luciferase reporter gene constructs are
used to show that the four alleles differ in their ability to drive gene e
xpression. In the absence of exogenous stimuli, alleles 1, 2, and 4 are poo
r promoters; allele 3 drives high expression, indicating that the repeat it
self has endogenous enhancer activity. All four alleles show a similar perc
entage enhancement of reporter gene expression in the presence of interfero
n-gamma, consistent with the multiple interferon-gamma response elements bo
th 5' and 3' of the Z-DNA forming repeat. However, while the addition of ba
cterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS) has no effect on alleles 1 and 4, it cause
s significant reduction in expression driven by allele 2 and enhances expre
ssion driven by allele 3, suggesting that the juxtaposition of LPS related
response elements (NF kappa B, AP-1, NF-IL6) may be differentially affected
by the two commonly occurring alleles. These results are consistent with t
he hypothesis that chronic hyperactivation of macrophages associated with a
llele 3 is functionally linked to autoimmune disease susceptibility, while
the poor level of NRAMP1 expression promoted by allele 2 contributes to inf
ectious disease susceptibility. Conversely, allele 3 protects against infec
tious disease and allele 2 against autoimmune disease. Hence, alleles that
are detrimental in relation to autoimmune disease susceptibility may be mai
ntained in the population because they improve survival to reproductive age
following infectious disease challenge.