Ac. Ferguson et al., Efficacy and safety of high-dose inhaled steroids in children with asthma:A comparison of fluticasone propionate with budesonide, J PEDIAT, 134(4), 1999, pp. 422-427
Objective: To compare the efficacy and adverse effects of inhaled fluticaso
ne propionate (FP), 400 mu g/d, with those of budesonide (BUD), 800 mu g/d,
in children with moderate to severe asthma.
Methods: Three hundred thirty-three children, ages 4 to 12 years, receiving
inhaled corticosteroids were enrolled in a double-blind, double-dummy, ran
domized, parallel-group study, After a 2-week run-in phase, 166 children re
ceived FP and 167 received BUD for 20 weeks. The primary outcome variable w
as mean morning peak expiratory flow; the 2 treatments were to be regarded
as equivalent if the 90% CI for the treatment difference was within +/- 15
L/min. Pulmonary function, height, and diary cards were assessed at each vi
sit; and morning serum cortisol levels were determined before and after tre
atment.
Results: Baseline peak expiratory flow was similar, FP 236 +/- 72 (SD) L/mi
n and BUD 229 +/- 74, increasing after treatment to 277 +/- 41 and 257 +/-
28, a difference between treatments of 12 L/min (90% CI 6-19 L/min; P = .00
2). Symptom control and use of rescue medication were the same: Cortisol le
vels after treatment were 199 nmol/L (FP) and 183 nmol/L (BUD) (treatment r
atio = 1.09; 90% CI 0.98-1.21; P = .172). Linear growth was less in those r
eceiving BUD (mean difference, 6.2 mm; 95% CI 2.9-9.6; P = .0003).
Conclusion: FP at half the dose was superior to BUD in improving peak expir
atory flow and comparable in controlling symptoms. Growth was reduced with
BUD compared with FP, but there was no difference in serum cortisol suppres
sion or hepatic or renal function.