Prevalence and detection of serious psychiatric disorder in defendants attending court

Citation
J. Shaw et al., Prevalence and detection of serious psychiatric disorder in defendants attending court, LANCET, 353(9158), 1999, pp. 1053-1056
Citations number
17
Categorie Soggetti
General & Internal Medicine","Medical Research General Topics
Journal title
LANCET
ISSN journal
01406736 → ACNP
Volume
353
Issue
9158
Year of publication
1999
Pages
1053 - 1056
Database
ISI
SICI code
0140-6736(19990327)353:9158<1053:PADOSP>2.0.ZU;2-L
Abstract
Background Diversion programmes in magistrates' courts are designed to prov ide immediate advice or access to mental-health treatment facilities for de fendants when appropriate. The prevalence of serious psychiatric disorder a nd the proportion of defendants who might require transfer are unknown. We undertook a study to address these issues and to find out whether defendant s with such disorders are reliably detected by court personnel and referred to psychiatric staff in court diversion programmes. Methods A two-phase screening method used questionnaires for psychiatric di sorder (the general health questionnaire and psychotic screening questionna ire) and screening instruments for alcohol and substance misuse followed by standard psychiatric interview (schedules for clinical assessment in neuro psychiatry). The detection rate of defendants with serious psychiatric diso rder by court staff was observed. Findings The frequency of serious psychiatric disorder was 1.31% (three of 229) among defendants appearing in court direct from the community and 6.57 % (96 of 1460) among those held in custody overnight. Of the 99 defendants with serious psychiatric disorder, 34 had schizophrenia and other psychoses and 55 had depressive disorders. 42 (76%) of the 55 individuals with depre ssive disorders had suicidal ideas, which were recorded on the first-phase screening questionnaire in many cases. Only 14 of 96 defendants from overni ght custody with serious psychiatric disorder were detected by court staff and referred to the court diversion programme. Interpretation There is a substantial rate of psychiatric disorder in the c ourt population, which is not satisfactorily detected with the current syst em. Brief screening questionnaires and training of court staff are probably necessary for detection of people with serious psychiatric disorder passin g through the courts.