D. Richter et al., The stabilizing effects of different orthoses for the intact and unstable upper cervical sine - A biomechanical study, LANG ARCH S, 1999, pp. 327-332
Background: Although there are only few reliable data about their stabilizi
ng effect on individual segments, a variety of different orthoses for the c
ervical spine are frequently used.
Methods: In an experimental study with 4 fresh-frozen cadavers the stabiliz
ing effects of Soft Collar(R), Miami J Collar(R), prefabricated Minerva Bra
ce(R), and Halo-Fixator were compared in the intact and unstable upper cerv
ical spine under fluoroscopy.
Results and conclusion: None of the tested orthoses restricts motion of the
upper cervical spine equally to the Halo-Fixator and is therefore able to
guarantee sufficient stability for conservative treatment of unstable fract
ures of C1 or C2. The development of a new orthosis with higher restriction
of relative movement appears to be possible.