Introduction: The identification of the HR (or RPE) associated with blood l
actate concentrations of 2.5 mmol.L-1 (aerobic threshold) (AerT) and 4.0 mm
ol.L-1 (anaerobic threshold) (AnT) is a common method for defining training
intensities. It is often assumed that the HR at AerT and AnT changes' with
changes in fitness, much as the power output (Watts:W) associated with Aer
T and AnT is known to change. Methods: We studied speed skaters (N = 13, 7
male, 6 female) during spring (deconditioned) and fall (conditioned) evalua
tions, using cycle ergometry (stage duration = 5 min) to determine W, HR, a
nd RPE at AerT, AnT, and at maximal exercise (3000 (female) and 5000 (male)
m cycle time trials). Results: In the spring vs fall evaluations, the powe
r output at AerT was 127 +/- 12 vs 162 +/- 9 W (P < 0.05), at AnT was 216 /- 14 vs 230 +/- 13 W (P < 0.05), and at maximal exercise was 341 +/- 15 vs
364 +/- 19 W (P < 0.05); HR at AerT was 129 +/- 6 vs 130 +/- 7 bpm (P > 0.
05), at AnT was 162 +/- 7 vs 164 +/- 7 bpm (P > 0.05), and at maximal exerc
ise was 196 +/- 6 vs 198 +/- 5 bpm (P > 0.05); RPE at AerT was 2.7 +/- 0.9
vs 2.6 +/- 0.8 (P > 0.05), at AnT was 5.3 +/- 1.0 vs 5.3 +/- 0.9 (P > 0.05)
. Conclusions: These data suggest that although power output at AerT, AnT,
and maximal exercise changes significantly with conditioning, there is no s
ystematic change in the associated values for HR and/or RPE used as practic
al markers of training intensity. Accordingly, a single well-conducted eval
uation may allow evaluation of appropriate training markers that may be lon
gitudinally stable.