J. Templar et al., Increased plasma malondialdehyde levels in glomerular disease as determined by a fully validated HPLC method, NEPH DIAL T, 14(4), 1999, pp. 946-951
Background. Reactive oxygen species and particularly free radical induced l
ipid peroxidative tissue damage have been implicated in the pathogenesis of
various renal diseases. Lipid peroxidation is assessed indirectly by the m
easurement of secondary products, such as malondialdehyde (MDA), using the
widely employed thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) method. How
ever, this method lacks sensitivity and specificity. We have therefore deve
loped and validated an HPLC thigh-performance liquid chromatography) method
for measurement of MDA and applied this to a variety of plasma samples in
renal patients.
Methods. The optimized method involves antioxidant treatment of the plasma
sample, followed by a protein precipitation step using trichloroacetic acid
, acid hydrolysis and formation of an MDA thiobarbituric acid complex. The
MDA-(TBA)(2) adduct is separated from other interfering compounds by C-18 r
everse-phase HPLC techniques, with visible detection at 532 nm.
Results, The assay was linear over the ranges 0.25-1.0 mu M MDA and the det
ection limit was 0.06 mu M MDA. Within-run precision was <4.5% and between-
run precision was <10.0%. MDA plasma concentrations (mean +/- SD) were high
er in ESRF diabetic patients (0.32 +/- 0.14 mu M, n = 20), non-diabetic ESR
F patients (0.32 +/- 0.09 mu M, n = 20), and CRF patients (0.14 +/- 0.06 mu
M, n = 40) compared to healthy controls (0.11 +/- 0.03 mu M, n = 40, (P <
0.001, P < 0.001 and P = 0.008). Levels were similar in healthy controls wi
th normal renal function and transplanted patients (0.12 +/- 0.03 mu M MDA,
n = 40), (P = NS). No correlation was observed between MDA and creatinine
levels (r(2) = 0.05, n = 80), which suggests that MDA does not correlate wi
th the degree of renal impairment. We matched CRF patients with glomerular
and nonglomerular causes of renal failure for creatinine levels and found t
hat MDA levels were higher in patients with glomerulonephritis (0.16 +/- 0.
06 mu M) than in those with CRF from non-glomerular causes (0.12 +/- 0.04 m
u M, P = 0.002).
Conclusions. We have introduced a reliable and sensitive HPLC technique to
enhance the specificity of MDA-(TBA)(2) measurement, with a significant imp
rovement in HPLC column life. Using this method, picomole quantities of MDA
can be detected in plasma. We have shown that MDA levels are significantly
raised in patients with CRF due to glomerulonephritis, regardless of serum
creatinine, which suggests that there is oxidative injury independent of a
ny possible MDA retention due to renal impairment.