The effects and consequences of using different kinds and combinations of s
tudent selection criteria are reported. The matriculation points score, a t
est of language and mathematics competence, a score based on tutorial assig
nments, matriculation mathematics, and a combined criterion, constituted th
e selection criteria. The first semester examinations of a group of first-y
ear psychology students (n = 543), consisting Of English first (n = 340) an
d second (n = 203) language speakers, constituted the outcome against which
the selection criteria were compared:The five different selection criteria
were applied retrospectively, thereby yielding comparative data on the eff
ects of each specific criterion. Using this procedure, it-was possible to c
ompare false-positive errors:(validity), false-negative errors (equity), to
tal error values (accuracy), exclusion rates (access) and failure rates (ex
cellence), for each of the selection criteria. The results show that the cr
iteria yielded a wide range of different effects and that the effects were
not uniform for English first- and second-language students. In particular,
English second-language students were disadvantaged by the use of the matr
iculation points score, especially with respect to access and equity. Altho
ugh relative to the matriculation points score, the test of language and ma
thematics competence yielded increases in access and equity for English fir
st-language students,it yielded the opposite effects for second-language st
udents for whom a lower failure rate was offset by the highest rate of excl
usion. The results indicate that the choice of a selection criterion will h
ave consequences, intended or not, that reflect admission policies, whether
explicitly or implicitly acknowledged.