Jm. Hemmi et U. Grunert, Distribution of photoreceptor types in the retina of a marsupial, the tammar wallaby (Macropus eugenii), VIS NEUROSC, 16(2), 1999, pp. 291-302
Mammalian retinae generally contain low numbers of short-wavelength-sensiti
ve cones (S-cones) and higher numbers of middle- to long-wavelength-sensiti
ve cones (M-cones). Some recent studies found topographic differences betwe
en the different photoreceptor types and in some instances between photorec
eptors and ganglion cells. To investigate this question further, we constru
cted topographical maps of the different photoreceptors found in an Austral
ian marsupial, the tammar wallaby. We used two polyclonal antibodies that h
ave been shown to label S-cones (JH455) or M-cones (JH492) in a range of ma
mmals. In the tammar wallaby, the antisera clearly distinguish two cone typ
es. JH455 recognizes a small subset of cones (S-cones) with a density of le
ss than 500 cells/mm(2) in the ventral retina. Their density increases towa
rds the dorsal retina to about 1600-2000 cells/mm(2). JH492 recognizes all
remaining cones (M-cones), but also faintly labels most cone cells recogniz
ed by JH455. The distribution of M-cones, unlike that of the S-cones, shows
a clear horizontal streak of high cell density through the central retina,
just like the ganglion cells. Unlike the ganglion cells, however, the M-co
nes do not peak in the temporal retina but show a very broad peak (12,000-1
8,000 cells/mm2) in the central or even slightly nasal retina. Based on our
findings, the retina of the tammar can be divided into three distinct regi
ons: firstly, the dorsal retina, which has a low ganglion and low cone cell
density but a high percentage of S-cones (30%), is thought to provide good
spectral sensitivity; secondly, the central horizontal band of retina, whi
ch has a high ganglion and high cone cell density and therefore provides go
od spatial resolution; and thirdly, the ventral retina, which has a low gan
glion cell but high cone cell density with few S-cones (5%) and is therefor
e thought to have a high contrast sensitivity but low acuity.