Conceptual and pragmatic considerations in conducting a secondary analysis- An example from research of families

Citation
Mp. Shepard et al., Conceptual and pragmatic considerations in conducting a secondary analysis- An example from research of families, W J NURS R, 21(2), 1999, pp. 154-167
Citations number
25
Categorie Soggetti
Public Health & Health Care Science
Journal title
WESTERN JOURNAL OF NURSING RESEARCH
ISSN journal
01939459 → ACNP
Volume
21
Issue
2
Year of publication
1999
Pages
154 - 167
Database
ISI
SICI code
0193-9459(199904)21:2<154:CAPCIC>2.0.ZU;2-N
Abstract
In this article, the authors discuss conceptual and pragmatic consideration s for conducting research of families using large secondary data sets. Conc eptual considerations include establishing consistency among the theory, va riables, and available data, and determining reliability and validity of th e data in the context of the theory. Pragmatic considerations include the u se of resources such as management of the data among several authors, crite ria and methods for selection of a subsample, and, recoding of the data to examine dyadic;difference scores. The Family Special Interest Group of the Eastern Nursing Research Society initiated this research as part of a proje ct to analyze families using large national data sets. The purpose of the s econdary analysis was to identify family beliefs about healt-promoting beha viors. Combining parent and teen data to create relational level data resul ted in new information that had not been identified in the original survey.