Ma. Luebke et al., COMPARISON OF THE MICROBIAL BARRIER PROPERTIES OF A NEEDLELESS AND A CONVENTIONAL NEEDLE-BASED INTRAVENOUS ACCESS SYSTEM, American journal of infection control, 26(4), 1998, pp. 437-441
Background: Sporadic reports of increased infection rates involving ne
edleless access systems, especially in home-care settings, have raised
questions concerning the safety of all needleless systems. Addressing
this concern, Baxter Healthcare Corporation and the Centers for Disea
se Control and Prevention performed parallel laboratory studies compar
ing the microbial barrier properties of the Interlink (trademark of Ba
xter Healthcare Corporation, Deerfield, Ill) needleless system with a
conventional intravenous access system. Methods: Studies of needleless
and conventional systems evaluated fluid path contamination introduce
d through injection site septa, which were intentionally inoculated wi
th high levels of bacteria and subsequently punctured with and without
alcohol swabbing disinfection before access. Results: With disinfecti
on, the combined effects of the disinfection technique and the barrier
properties of the septa prevented the transfer of organisms into the
fluid path in 94% to 96% of needleless rest articles and 96% to 100% o
f conventional test articles. Without disinfection, the barrier proper
ties of the septa alone prevented the transfer of organisms into the f
luid path in 20% to 69% of needleless test articles and 10% to 28% of
conventional test articles. Conclusions: The data demonstrate the need
leless system performs as well as the conventional intravenous access
system with respect to the risk of microbial contamination and reinfor
ce the need for appropriate septum disinfection before accessing eithe
r system (AJIC Am J Infect Control 1998;26:437-41).