PAIN DRAWING EVALUATION - THE PROBLEM WITH THE CLINICALLY BIASED SURGEON - INTRA-OBSERVER AND INTEROBSERVER AGREEMENT IN 50 CASES RELATED TO CLINICAL BIAS

Citation
T. Reigo et al., PAIN DRAWING EVALUATION - THE PROBLEM WITH THE CLINICALLY BIASED SURGEON - INTRA-OBSERVER AND INTEROBSERVER AGREEMENT IN 50 CASES RELATED TO CLINICAL BIAS, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica, 69(4), 1998, pp. 408-411
Citations number
20
Categorie Soggetti
Orthopedics
ISSN journal
00016470
Volume
69
Issue
4
Year of publication
1998
Pages
408 - 411
Database
ISI
SICI code
0001-6470(1998)69:4<408:PDE-TP>2.0.ZU;2-W
Abstract
To assess whether the clinical knowledge of the treating surgeon had a ny effect on the reliability of the pain-drawing evaluation, drawings from 50 low-back pain patients were evaluated by the treating surgeon and by three colleagues who had no clinical knowledge of the patient. The evaluation was repeated after 10 days. The treating surgeons were also blinded to clinical data. The kappa value in the evaluation when the surgeon had clinical knowledge of the patient was lower (0.29 (95% CI 0.13-0.45)) than the kappa value in the evaluations made without c linical knowledge (0.60 (CI 0.45-0.75)), The differences observed in i nterobserver reliability between open and blind evaluations suggest th at clinical knowledge of a patient influences the evaluation of the pa in drawings.