PAIN DRAWING EVALUATION - THE PROBLEM WITH THE CLINICALLY BIASED SURGEON - INTRA-OBSERVER AND INTEROBSERVER AGREEMENT IN 50 CASES RELATED TO CLINICAL BIAS
T. Reigo et al., PAIN DRAWING EVALUATION - THE PROBLEM WITH THE CLINICALLY BIASED SURGEON - INTRA-OBSERVER AND INTEROBSERVER AGREEMENT IN 50 CASES RELATED TO CLINICAL BIAS, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica, 69(4), 1998, pp. 408-411
To assess whether the clinical knowledge of the treating surgeon had a
ny effect on the reliability of the pain-drawing evaluation, drawings
from 50 low-back pain patients were evaluated by the treating surgeon
and by three colleagues who had no clinical knowledge of the patient.
The evaluation was repeated after 10 days. The treating surgeons were
also blinded to clinical data. The kappa value in the evaluation when
the surgeon had clinical knowledge of the patient was lower (0.29 (95%
CI 0.13-0.45)) than the kappa value in the evaluations made without c
linical knowledge (0.60 (CI 0.45-0.75)), The differences observed in i
nterobserver reliability between open and blind evaluations suggest th
at clinical knowledge of a patient influences the evaluation of the pa
in drawings.