The aim of this study was to measure the effects of heparin therapy in
patients undergoing Vascular surgery, and to monitor the effectivenes
s of continuous intravenous heparin therapy in ward-based patients. In
addition, we compared results from a new portable device with those f
rom the standard laboratory assay. A prospective comparison of the two
methods in patients undergoing peripheral vascular surgery, and in wa
rd-based patients who were receiving intravenous heparin infusions was
undertaken, Fifty patients who were undergoing vascular surgery and r
eceiving a bolus dose of intravenous heparin, and 22 patients receivin
g a continuous heparin infusion, were recruited. Blood samples were ta
ken 10 and 40 min following bolus heparin administration or after > 12
h of a continuous heparin infusion. Plasma activated partial thrombopl
astin times (APTTp) measured by the haematology laboratory were compar
ed with whole blood (APTT(B)) ascertained with the CoaguChek Plus Devi
ce (Boehringer Mannheim UK Diagnostics and Biochemicals Limited) at ea
ch time point. The results from the two methods were compared using th
e method of Bland and Altman (Lancet, 1986, 307-310). We found a good
level of agreement between the two methods (at induction, mean bias wa
s -0.050, limits of agreement -0.46-0.36: heparin infusions. mean bias
was -0.283, limits of agreement -1.64-1.07). In addition we discovere
d that many of our patients appeared to be excessively anticoagulated
during surgery (10 min following heparin bolus 47/50 patients had an A
PTT(B) > 150 s, 45/50 had an APTTp > 250 s; at 40 min 45/50 had an APT
T(B) > 150 s, 39/50 had an APTTp > 250 s), In conclusion, whole blood
APTT measurement allows rapid and accurate assessment of the effects o
f heparin therapy when compared with laboratory APTT measurement and m
ay prevent both excessive and suboptimal anticoagulation. (C) 1998 The
International Society for Cardiovascular Surgery. Published by Elsevi
er Science Ltd. All rights reserved.