Jb. Jones et Dj. Dula, THE EFFICACY OF SUBLINGUAL HYOSCYAMINE SULFATE AND INTRAVENOUS KETOROLAC TROMETHAMINE IN THE RELIEF OF URETERAL COLIC, The American journal of emergency medicine, 16(6), 1998, pp. 557-559
A prospective, randomized, open-label, single-dose study was con ducte
d in an emergency department (ED) of a tertiary care teaching hospital
to evaluate the efficacy of hyoscyamine sulfate as compared to ketoro
lac tromethamine for the reduction of pain from ureteral colic in the
ED, Patients were included if they were at least 18 years of age and p
resented to the ED with an initial history and physical examination co
nsistent with ureteral colic. Ureteral calculi were confirmed by ultra
sound or intravenous urogram, Consecutive patients were randomized to
either a single sublingual dose of 0.125 mg of hyoscyamine sulfate or
a single intravenous dose of 30 mg of ketorolac tromethamine given ov
er 1 minute, After 30 minutes, if analgesia was inadequate, patients w
ere given rescue medication. Baseline pain scores were obtained using
a horizontal, 100-mm visual analog scale. Additional pain scores were
obtained at 10 minute intervals for 30 minutes, Upon completion of the
study, both patients and physicians completed a global assessment sco
re questionnaire. Fifty-four evaluable patients were randomized, Demog
raphics and baseline pain scores were similar for each group, Decreasi
ng trends in pain over time were observed for both treatment groups, w
ith significantly greater pain reduction observed with ketorolac trome
thamine as compared to hyoscyamine sulfate, Global evaluations of pain
relief revealed better results in the ketorolac tromethamine group th
an in the hyoscyamine sulfate group, although this result was not stat
istically significant, (Am J Emerg Med 1998;16:557 559. Copyright (C)
1998 by W,B. Saunders Company).