Y. Yamashita et al., ASSESSMENT OF MYOMETRIAL INVASION BY ENDOMETRIAL - CARCINOMA - TRANSVAGINAL SONOGRAPHY VS CONTRAST-ENHANCED MR-IMAGING, American journal of roentgenology, 161(3), 1993, pp. 595-599
OBJECTIVE. A prospective study was designed to compare transvaginal so
nography with contrast-enhanced MR imaging to determine preoperatively
the depth of myometrial invasion in patients with early-stage endomet
rial carcinoma. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. In 40 patients, findings on tran
svaginal sonograms, unenhanced T2-weighted MR images, and contrast-enh
anced T1-weighted MR images were compared with histologic findings. Th
e depth of myometrial invasion was classified as stage E (tumor limite
d to endometrium, n = 12), stage S (superficial invasion: tumor invade
s up to 50% of the myometrium, n = 15), or stage D (deep invasion: tum
or invades more than 50% of the myometrium, n = 13). RESULTS. Findings
on transvaginal sonograms were accurate in 27 of 40 patients (accurac
y, 68%); the depth of invasion was overestimated in five patients and
underestimated in eight patients. The results of unenhanced T2-weighte
d MR images were accurate in 27 patients (accuracy, 68%), with four ov
erestimations and nine underestimations. The results of contrast-enhan
ced T1 -weighted MR images were accurate in 34 patients (accuracy, 85%
), with five underestimations and one overestimation. In the assessmen
t of each stage of myometrial invasion, the sensitivity and specificit
y of contrast-enhanced T1-weighted imaging were higher than those of T
2-weighted MR imaging and transvaginal sonography. The false-positive
diagnoses based on transvaginal sonograms and T2-weighted images, resp
ectively, involved polypoid tumors (n = 4 and 2), distension of the en
dometrial cavity by pyometra (n = 2 and 1), the presence of myoma (n =
2 and 1), atrophy of the myometrium (n = 1 and 0), and poor tumor/myo
metrium contrast (n = 0 and 2). On contrast-enhanced MR images, accura
cy was influenced only in a case of polypoid tumor, because tumor, end
ometrial cavity, and myometrium were clearly distinguished and residua
l myometrium was clearly visualized. With all imaging techniques, fals
e-negative diagnoses were caused mainly by tumors with superficially s
preading growth or microscopic invasion. With transvaginal sonography,
infiltrative tumor also tended to be understaged (n = 3). CONCLUSION.
Contrast-enhanced MR imaging is significantly superior to transvagina
l sonography and unenhanced T2-weighted MR imaging for detecting myome
trial invasion.