Dm. Marcus et al., TELEMEDICINE DIAGNOSIS OF EYE DISORDERS BY DIRECT OPHTHALMOSCOPY - A PILOT-STUDY, Ophthalmology (Rochester, Minn.), 105(10), 1998, pp. 1907-1914
Objective: To report a pilot study of telemedical direct ophthalmoscop
y in the diagnosis of acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS)-relat
ed retinopathy in a human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-positive popula
tion and in the diagnosis of glaucoma, cataract, and retinopathy in a
diabetic population. Design: Prospective comparative case series. Part
icipants: Seventeen HIV-positive and 20 diabetic patients. Methods: A
direct ophthalmoscope custom-fitted with a digital microcamera capable
of transmitting images from any of 61 sites within the Georgia Statew
ide Telemedicine Program was used by a nonophthalmologist to examine 3
4 eyes of 17 HIV-positive patients and 39 eyes of 20 patients with dia
betes. Fundus images were transmitted in real-time to a reviewing opht
halmologist. An in-person, comprehensive examination including indirec
t ophthalmoscopy, was performed by a second ophthalmologist, Telemedic
al examination was compared to the in-person comprehensive examination
. Results: For the HIV study, 21 eyes did not show HIV retinopathy (no
ninfectious retinopathy with cotton-wool spots) by in-person examinati
on. Telemedical examination correctly identified 20 of these eves as d
isease-free (specificity = 95%), HIV retinopathy was present ir 12 of
the 34 eyes by in-person evaluation with telemedical examination corre
ctly diagnosing 10 of these eyes (sensitivity = 83%). One eye with den
se cataract and retinal detachment was unable to be evaluated ophthalm
oscopically by either in-person or telemedical examination. Telemedica
l and in-person assessments for HIV retinopathy were identical in 100%
of eyes without cataract. Disagreement in diagnosis between telemedic
al and in-person examination was associated with cataract (P < 0.0007)
. For the diabetes study, because of an inadequate image, telemedical
examination was unable to classify 46% and 36% of eyes for glaucoma an
d diabetic retinopathy, respectively. Inability to make a telemedical
determination for glaucoma (P < 0.011), nonproliferative (P < 0.064) a
nd proliferative (P < 0.064) diabetic retinopathy was associated with
cataract. Of the eyes that were able to be assessed by telemedical exa
mination for diabetic retinopathy (n = 25), glaucoma (n = 21), and cat
aract (n = 39), the accuracy was poor (sensitivity = 29%, 50%, and 41%
, respectively), Telemedical examination for diabetic retinopathy and
glaucoma was more likely to agree with in-person examination in eyes w
ithout cataract as compared to eyes with cataract (not statistically s
ignificant).Conclusion: Telemedical direct ophthalmoscopic, real-time
fundus imaging may provide a valuable means for providing ophthalmic c
onsultation to the primary care physician in younger patients without
lens or media opacity, but is inadequate for eyes with any degree of l
ens or media opacity.