Tony Lawson has argued that the methodology of neoclassical economics
is deductivist: in constructing their formal models, economists hope t
o be able to provide explanations based on laws, as described by the d
eductive-nomological model of explanation. This article argues in cont
rast that neoclassical economics cannot be understood as following jus
t one methodology. It is argued that neoclassicism exhibits two method
ologies, one ''official'' and one tacit. The former is empiricist, and
corresponds to the practice that has been described by Lawson. The la
tter, which can be called ''hypothetico-deductive rationalism'', amoun
ts to the position that knowledge of the world can be obtained without
any empirical verification of one's assumptions, simply by exploring
the implications of the assumptions one makes.