Ad. Seidman et al., DOSE-DENSE THERAPY WITH WEEKLY 1-HOUR PACLITAXEL INFUSIONS IN THE TREATMENT OF METASTATIC BREAST-CANCER, Journal of clinical oncology, 16(10), 1998, pp. 3353-3361
Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of paclitaxel administe
red as a 1-hour infusion on weekly basis, without interruption, to pat
ients with metastatic breast cancer who had received prior therapy. Pa
tients and Methods: Thirty patients with metastatic breast cancer rece
ived sustained weekly paclitaxel therapy at an initial dose of 100 mg/
m(2) until disease progression. Prior therapy included adjuvant only (
n = 17), metastatic only (n = 7), or both (n = 6). Eighteen patients h
ad received prior anthracycline therapy, 12 of whom had demonstrated p
rogression of disease within 12 months of it. All patients were assess
able for efficacy; 29 patients were assessable for toxicity. Pharmacok
inetic studies of paclitaxel were also performed. Results: A total of
469 weekly paclitaxel infusions were administered to 30 patients (medi
an, 14 infusions/patient). The median delivered dose-intensity was 91
mg/m(2)/wk (range, 80 to 108). The overall response rate was 53% (95%
confidence interval [CI], 34% to 72%), with 10% complete responses (CR
s) and 43% partial responses (PRs). Median response duration was 7.5 m
onths (range, 2 to 11+). Responses were observed in nine of 18 (50%) p
atients with prior anthracycline therapy, including six of 12 (50%) wi
th disease progression on anthracycline within 1 year (three of four w
ithin 6 months). Therapy was well tolerated and remarkable for a lack
of overall and cumulative myelosuppression. Grade 3/4 neutropenia occu
rred in four patients; febrile neutropenia was not observed. Periphera
l neuropathy prohibited dose escalation above 100 mg/m(2), and grade 3
neuropathy was observed in two of 21 patients at less than or equal t
o 100 mg/m(2). Conclusion: Weekly paclitaxel therapy is active and wel
l tolerated in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Weekly therapy
should be considered as a current clinical option for these patients a
nd should be incorporated into future comparative clinical trials. (C)
1998 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.