Me. Mcivor et al., STUDY OF PACEMAKER AND IMPLANTABLE CARDIOVERTER-DEFIBRILLATOR TRIGGERING BY ELECTRONIC ARTICLE SURVEILLANCE DEVICES (SPICED TEAS), PACE, 21(10), 1998, pp. 1847-1861
The magnetic fields emitted by electronic article surveillance (EAS) s
ystems (shoplifting gates) are a source of interference for implanted
medical devices. In the Study of Pacemaker and Implantable Cardioverte
r Defibrillator Triggering by Electronic Article Surveillance Devices
(SPICED TEAS), 25 adult volunteers with ICDs and 50 with pacemakers we
re exposed to the fields of six different EAS systems. These EAS syste
ms used three modes of operation: magnetic audio frequency, swept radi
ofrequency, and acoustomagnetic technology. No ICD exhibited interfere
nce mimicking sensing of tachyarrhythmias with any EAS system. Pacemak
ers interacted variably, depending on the type of EAS system. Swept ra
diofrequency systems produced no interaction with any implanted medica
l device. One magnetic audio frequency system interacted with 2 of 50
pacemakers. The acoustomagnetic system interacted with 48 of 50 pacema
kers. Interactions included asynchronous pacing, atrial oversensing (p
roducing ''EAS induced tachycardia'' in the ventricle), ventricular ov
ersensing (with pacemaker inhibition), and paced beats resulting from
the direct induction of current in the pacemaker (''EAS induced pacing
''). These interactions produced symptoms in some patients (palpitatio
ns, presyncope) only while patients were in the EAS field. No pacemake
r was reprogrammed. We conclude that high energy, pulsed low frequency
EAS systems such as acoustomagnetic systems interfere with most pacem
akers. Pacemaker patients should be advised to minimize exposure to th
e fields of such systems to prevent the possibility of serious clinica
l events.