Three characteristic features describe our understanding of the clinic
al course and outcome in multiple sclerosis: a validated statistical m
odel of disease progression, wide interindividual variability, and a f
ixed rate of progression in an individual patient. However for and ind
ividual patient it is still impossible to derive a precise and exact p
rediction of disease outcome. the only reliable method is the determin
istic approach developed by Fog and Linneman in 1970 which consists in
objective quantitative neurological examinations performed at three m
onth intervals over several years in the same patient in routine pract
ice, this method in rather unrealistic. Bran MRI data with conventiona
l techniques are also poorly discriminant. Conversely, it may be antic
ipated that new magnetic resonance techniques, more sensitive to axona
l loss, demyelinization and gliosis, will provide reliable answers to
this issue upon which therapeutic decisions depend.