A MOLECULAR SYSTEMATIC INVESTIGATION OF THE ACROCHAETIALES (FLORIDEOPHYCIDAE, RHODOPHYTA) AND RELATED TAXA BASED ON NUCLEAR SMALL-SUBUNIT RIBOSOMAL DNA-SEQUENCE DATA
Jt. Harper et Gw. Saunders, A MOLECULAR SYSTEMATIC INVESTIGATION OF THE ACROCHAETIALES (FLORIDEOPHYCIDAE, RHODOPHYTA) AND RELATED TAXA BASED ON NUCLEAR SMALL-SUBUNIT RIBOSOMAL DNA-SEQUENCE DATA, European journal of phycology, 33(3), 1998, pp. 221-229
Small-subunit ribosomal DNA (SSU) sequences for 14 members of the rhod
ophyte order Acrochaetiales were used to generate phylogenetic trees t
o determine whether the Acrochaetiales is monophyletic and to assess t
he relationships of acrochaetioid algae to closely related taxa. Withi
n the Acrochaetiales, two strongly supported groups are recognized: on
e group that includes, in addition to three other species, the type sp
ecies of the genera Arochaetium, Audouinella and Rhodochorton; and a s
econd group that includes an unequivocal representative of Colaconema
and nine additional species. The relationships of these groups with th
e Batrachospermales, Palmariales and Nemaliales were not resolved and
the possibility that the Acrochaetiales is polyphyletic was not elimin
ated. Resolution of relationships for species within these groups was
strong in only a few cases, with many of the phylogenetic issues at th
is level remaining equivocal. Our results do not position Camontagnea
in the Acrochaetiales, as has recently been suggested, but strongly al
ly this genus to the family Rhodothamniellaceae of the Palmariales. Th
e phylogenetic position of Rhododraparnaldia, an alga intermediate bet
ween the Acrochaetiales and Batrachospermales, remains unresolved. The
se molecular results provide a foundation for assessing the taxonomic
significance of phenotypic characters (e.g. anatomy, life histories, m
orphology, phycoerythrin type and plastid details) variously considere
d taxonomically significant in the Acrochaetiales.