The presumption that agency is primarily the function or personificati
on of a naturalized human actant can be traced through a Western intel
lectual tradition which draws upon a dualistic conception of the self
as a unified, productive, sovereign subject, and an independent, exter
nal, physical other. In this paper, I problematize the prevalence of s
uch Cartesian differentiation. I review an alternative, postfoundation
al actant ontology, then trace the resemblances in the work on situate
d knowledges. These orientations challenge the hierarchical division b
etween the internal self and the external other and instead emphasize
the relational, material, and performative nature of human being. Draw
ing on the notion of proximal thinking, I suggest that formal organiza
tions can productively be described as relational spaces, containing m
ultiple and complex frontiers, frames and interfaces, with(in) which o
stensibly differentiated and individualistic attitudes toward agency g
ive way to the variety and possibility of the self-in-between; a cybor
g-consciousness able to withstand the tension of partial identities an
d contradictory voices.